FOX31 Denver

Petito-Laundrie case reaches court for 1st time: 5 things to know

A lawsuit filed by the family of Gabby Petito now has an initial witness list, which includes Chris and Roberta Laundrie, law enforcement officers and others connected to the case. (Photos: NewsNation, WFLA)

VENICE, Fla. (WFLA) — The first hearing in the lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito’s family against the parents of Brian Laundrie will be held Wednesday to determine if the case will proceed to a jury trial next year.

Judge Hunter W. Carroll will hear arguments from both sides after attorneys for Chris and Roberta Laundrie submitted a motion to dismiss the lawsuit that was filed in March by Petito’s parents, Joe Petito and Nichole Schmidt.

Joe Petito and Schmidt filed the lawsuit on the grounds of “intentional infliction of emotional distress,” claiming the Laundries were aware their son Brian had murdered their daughter and had chosen not to act. The lawsuit also includes claims that Chris and Roberta Laundrie sought to help their son flee the country and blocked Schmidt on her phone and Facebook page.

“While Joseph Petito and Nichole Schmidt were desperately searching for information concerning their daughter, Christopher Laundrie and Roberta Laundrie were keeping the whereabouts of Brian Laundrie secret, and it is believed were making arrangements for him to leave the country,” the suit says.

Steven Bertolino, the attorney representing the Laundries since September after Brian Laundrie returned from a cross-country road trip without Gabby Petito, has called the allegations in the lawsuit “baseless.” In the argument filed for the motion to dismiss, the Laundries argued their choice to remain silent during their son’s disappearance “is what most people would and should do.”

Earlier this year, the FBI concluded that Brian Laundrie strangled Gabby Petito — his fiancée with whom he had at least one previous domestic incident with — during their cross-country trip and that Brian Laundrie died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head in the Carlton Reserve after returning home alone Sept. 1.

Wednesday’s pre-trial hearing, which begins at 1:30 p.m. ET in Sarasota County Circuit Court in Venice, Florida, will mark the first time the Gabby Petito case reaches a courtroom and sets up Judge Carroll’s decision on whether to proceed to trial.

Here are five things to know ahead of Wednesday’s hearing:

Petito’s family claims to have evidence

The lawsuit includes the allegation that Chris and Roberta Laundrie were told by their son of Petito’s murder “on or about” Aug. 28.

“It is believed, and therefore averred that… Brian Laundrie advised his parents, Christopher Laundrie and Roberta Laundrie, that he had murdered Gabrielle Petito,” the lawsuit states. “On that same date, Christopher Laundrie and Roberta Laundrie spoke with Attorney Steve Bertolino, and sent him a retainer on Sept. 2, 2021.”

What the lawsuit doesn’t include at this stage, however, is any evidence to back up this claim or any of the other allegations listed.

Speaking to WFLA.com in March, Pat Reilly, the Florida attorney representing Joe Petito and Schmidt in the civil suit, suggested their evidence would be revealed as their lawsuit moves forward.

“They’ll have to wait and see,” Reilly said when asked about evidence. “If we didn’t believe it was true, we wouldn’t have put them in the complaint.”

Laundries chose to remain silent, speak through attorney

Chris and Roberta Laundrie were never charged during the FBI’s investigation into Gabby Petito’s death.

In October, however, North Port Police spokesperson Josh Taylor told WFLA that NPPD investigators had mistaken Roberta Laundrie for Brian Laundrie in September due to a “lack of cooperation from the [Laundrie] family early on” in the investigation.

Bertolino has stated numerous times that his clients cooperated with law enforcement and that their choice to remain silent to the public, including the Petito and Schmidt families, is protected under the U.S. Constitution.

“As I have maintained over the last several months, the Laundries have not publicly commented at my direction, which is their right under the law,” Bertolino said in March. “Assuming everything the Petitos allege in their lawsuit is true, which we deny, this lawsuit does not change the fact that the Laundries had no obligation to speak to law enforcement or any third-party, including the Petito family. This fundamental legal principle renders the Petitos’ claims to be baseless under the law.”

Lawsuit’s ‘wish list’ of witnesses revealed

In May, the lawsuit’s initial witness list was made public, revealing from whom the plaintiffs are seeking testimony.

The initial witness list is routine, procedural and far from a definitive list of names that would testify should the lawsuit reach a jury trial, but it does offer a glimpse into the strategy behind the lawsuit:

“It’s a wish list,” Laundrie attorney Steven Bertolino said. “I’m sure [Petito and Schmidt attorney Pat Reilly] put every party on that list that [he] believes he needs testimony from to prove his case.”

Jury trial is not guaranteed

Carroll has scheduled a jury trial for August 2023, however, that doesn’t mean it is guaranteed to happen.

Matthew Luka, the Florida attorney for the Laundries, has filed two motions to dismiss the lawsuit. The second motion was filed after Reilly resubmitted an altered version of the suit to correct what Carroll noted to be a “procedural deficiency.”

“The amended complaint did not have any new facts or cite any law that would support the Petito’s legally baseless claim. We are confident our current motion to dismiss the amended complaint will be granted,” Bertolino told WFLA.com.

Wednesday’s hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled to last for one hour with enough time to hear arguments from both sides. Luka is expected to make arguments for the Laundries while Reilly is expected to counter on behalf of Joe Petito and Schmidt. Bertolino, who is not licensed to practice law in Florida, told WFLA he will appear virtually from New York.

Joe Petito and Schmidt are expected to attend the hearing, Reilly said. Chris and Roberta Laundrie will not be there, said Bertolino.

A decision on whether to grant the dismissal or proceed toward trial is expected to be released by Carroll at some point this summer.

Camera access permitted in courtroom

Per the rules of the courthouse, camera access is permitted at Wednesday’s hearing and throughout the trial.

Wednesday’s hearing will be open to the public.