This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

UNITED STATES — The number of Americans who have always been single and will likely never marry is at a historic high.

According to a 2014 Pew Research report, “about 20 percent of Americans older than 25 had always been single in 2012, up from 9 percent in 1960.” And if things trend in this direct, their analysis suggests that 25 percent of millennials will never marry.

Why is marriage on the downtrend? It could be that marriage is starting to lose the status it once had, or that unemployment is preventing people from settling down. Though wedding bells might not be ringing as often throughout the country as a whole, there are still some places where marriage is very much alive and thriving.

MooseRoots used census data to see how marriage rates have changed in different parts of the country over time. The rates are then ranked each state by the change in percentage of married couples to find the top cities where marriage is going out of style and where it seems like it’s here to stay. The focus was on cities with populations over 100,000, ranked by the percentage change of married couples in 1970 and 2010. The first 10 are ordered by the smallest negative change (meaning marriage is trending down, but not as quickly as the rest of the country), and the last 10 are ordered by the biggest negative change (meaning marriage is fading the fastest).

[protected-iframe id=”ec2f16b4f583d74f2fa10a1906f32ec8-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/gxiSJPtziWV” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]


10 cities where marriage has stayed relatively stagnant:

10. Cambridge, MA

[protected-iframe id=”aa171e5a5a5d4661041f780533501fff-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/dMY62zQ31fT” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]


Population: 103,506
Married Couples in 1970: 40.3%
Married Couples in 2010: 34.5%

Difference: -5.8%

9. Olathe, KS

[protected-iframe id=”c49211d18faf2fd1b8c812ecf72cbd11-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/4RnxM0w6AKx” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 120,774
Married Couples in 1970: 66.1%
Married Couples in 2010: 61.2%

Difference: -4.9%

8. Rochester, MN

[protected-iframe id=”ec326c9c9554d243fcb5e443151088f3-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/hdT4UDSWSnb” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 104,201
Married Couples in 1970: 59.7%
Married Couples in 2010: 55.2%

Difference: -4.5%

7. Brownsville, TX

[protected-iframe id=”3e81b14657d9682e808b5640f5b1059a-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/bJdvw8BUiZ7″ width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 169,599
Married Couples in 1970: 53.9%
Married Couples in 2010: 49.9%

Difference: -4.0%

6. Provo, UT

[protected-iframe id=”122135e61d0899b35919eb49a2b1abcc-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/8YSIOSYo1i5″ width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 110,201
Married Couples in 1970: 44.2%
Married Couples in 2010: 40.3%

Difference: -3.9%

5. Gilbert, AZ

[protected-iframe id=”cd1f1517cfe012899bbe5de74f46d033-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/7r4hqyyhu5v” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 195,046
Married Couples in 1970: 62.8%
Married Couples in 2010: 59.4%

Difference: -3.4%

4. Naperville, IL

[protected-iframe id=”a9d14443742ea608b92c19525efd6646-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/cVJQP3Pk3tz” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 140,838
Married Couples in 1970: 65.9%
Married Couples in 2010: 62.8%

Difference: -3.0%

3. McKinney, TX

[protected-iframe id=”715b714e3d219ee40d56bc98356a3a3f-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/laKcUOJSUyF” width=”100%” height=”470″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 118,652
Married Couples in 1970: 60.9%
Married Couples in 2010: 62.0%

Difference: 1.1%

2. Frisco, TX

[protected-iframe id=”29627134e5a77063ee1c86d9b9f1073e-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/h3f1RWhBu17″ width=”100%” height=”470″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 103,158
Married Couples in 1970: 69.0%
Married Couples in 2010: 70.2%

Difference: 1.1%

1. Surprise, AZ

[protected-iframe id=”53116342c743a8669542aaeed58877fc-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/byzstr0yUD3″ width=”100%” height=”470″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 103,767
Married Couples in 1970: 64.0%
Married Couples in 2010: 66.5%

Difference: 2.5%

10 cities where marriage is on the outs:

10. Memphis, TN

[protected-iframe id=”4ce8886c91fc917dab74dad18c6cade1-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/lVfSxXiwUl” width=”100%” height=”300″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 654,876
Married Couples in 1970: 57.6%
Married Couples in 2010: 32.5%

Difference: -25.1%

9. Cleveland, OH

[protected-iframe id=”49a386d99ee21fcf8786d4aa8eb10ce6-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/jAgKLjpWwLz” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 409,221
Married Couples in 1970: 52.9%
Married Couples in 2010: 27.6%

Difference: -25.3%

8. Birmingham, AL

[protected-iframe id=”dd2d10cb9a2b97cce3df35f44ce5385d-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/5a0D6eOXwS9″ width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 216,392
Married Couples in 1970: 55.9%
Married Couples in 2010: 30.2%

Difference: -25.7%

7. Pompano Beach, FL

[protected-iframe id=”92893d19b8a681b840d609490ce38b44-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/c1QAQmULf6J” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 100,417
Married Couples in 1970: 66.4%
Married Couples in 2010: 40.1%

Difference: -26.3%

6. Rochester, NY

[protected-iframe id=”16585e047d7783639d68ffc7b7a5cba1-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/kgQWW7Pk6bP” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 211,977
Married Couples in 1970: 53.2%
Married Couples in 2010: 26.8%

Difference: -26.4%

5. Jackson, MS

[protected-iframe id=”c72b161668dcde1706ed5a4cb4004f9b-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/f7ttD1KYjvT” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 175,489
Married Couples in 1970: 57.5%
Married Couples in 2010: 30.9%

Difference: -26.6%

4. Killeen, TX

[protected-iframe id=”89429d0a6d2cd8c4662a15a428ba72d8-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/guDRYEzJsmp” width=”100%” height=”470″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 120,052
Married Couples in 1970: 78.4%
Married Couples in 2010: 51.2%

Difference: -27.2%

3. Sunrise Manor, NV

[protected-iframe id=”b76f2299a534d3cb81a95f0b129d626a-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/jpCHIBOB8pv” width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 194,258
Married Couples in 1970: 74.1%
Married Couples in 2010: 46.0%

Difference: -28.1%

2. Detroit, MI

[protected-iframe id=”5389883d7fec61b42151ebd43685e302-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/7JHmKMR8qd7″ width=”100%” height=”450″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 759,340
Married Couples in 1970: 53.5%
Married Couples in 2010: 25.0%

Difference: -28.5%

1. Flint, MI

[protected-iframe id=”ff4ac579e07a6d8efe3f821094d7419a-28572344-21363060″ info=”//www.findthebest.com/w/ltnif32JQGh” width=”100%” height=”520″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Population: 107,807
Married Couples in 1970: 60.0%
Married Couples in 2010: 28.4%

Difference: -31.6%